On the acceptability of multiple interrogatives in Italian





experimental syntax, Italian, multiple interrogatives, A-bar phenomena


Multiple interrogatives exhibit cross-linguistic variation from a typological point of view. Standard Italian, in particular, is considered to be a language disallowing these constructions, an analysis based on the interaction between whPs and focused constituents in this language. I argue that previous analyses of multiple wh-questions in Italian need to be integrated with novel data, and that these structures are at least marginally acceptable. Specifically, I illustrate data from a preliminary experiment involving acceptability judgements on a 5-point Likert scale that tested whether native Italian speakers consider multiple interrogatives acceptable. While this is still a preliminary investigation, the results indicate that younger native Italian speakers tend to accept these constructions. I suggest that the presence of two whPs within the same clause in Italian can be analyzed as a language contact phenomenon, with English being the source language, in line with the sociolinguistic literature on this topic.


Alboiu, G. (2004). Optionality at the interface: Triggering focus in Romanian. In A. Breitbarth, & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Triggers (pp. 49-77). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197433.49

Belletti, A. (2004). Aspects of the low IP area. In L. Rizzi (Ed.) The structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 2 (pp. 16-51). Oxford University Press.

Berruto, G. (1987). Sociolinguistica dell'italiano contemporaneo. Carocci.

Berruto, G. (2017). What is changing in Italian today? Phenomena of restandardization in syntax and morphology: An overview. In M. Cerruti, C. Crocco, & S. Marzo (Eds.), Towards a new standard: Theoretical and empirical studies on the restandardization of Italian (pp. 31-60). Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518839-002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518839-002

Calabrese, A. (1984). Multiple questions and focus in Italian. In W. de Geest, & Y. Putseys (Eds.), Sentential complementation (pp. 67-74). Foris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110882698-007

Cinque, G., & Rizzi, L. (2008). The cartography of syntactic structures. CISCL Working Papers, 2, pp. 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0003

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/AD0616323

Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transformations. In S. Anderson, & P. Kiparsky (Eds.) A festschrift for Morris Halle (pp. 232–286). Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Chomsky, N. (1977). On wh-movement. In P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow, & A. Akmajian (Eds.), Formal syntax. Academic Press.

D’Alessandro, R. (2020). Syntactic change in contact: Romance. Annual Review of Linguistics, 7(23), pp. 1- 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030311

Gibson, E., & Fedorenko, E. (2013). The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, pp. 88-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.515080

Giorgi, A. (2015). Discourse and the syntax of the left periphery. In J. Bayer, R. Hinterhölzl, & Trotzke, A. (Eds.) Discourse-oriented syntax (pp. 229-250). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/la.226.10gio

Grasso, D. (2007). Innovazioni sintattiche in italiano alla luce della nozione di calco. PhD Thesis.

Ondelli, S., & Viale, M. (2010). L’assetto dell’italiano delle traduzioni in un corpus giornalistico: Aspetti qualitativi e quantitativi, Rivista internazionale di tecnica della traduzione, 12, pp. 1-62.

Richards, N. (2014). A-bar movement. In A. Carnie, D. Siddiqi, & Y. Sato (Eds.), Routledge handbook of syntax (pp. 167-191). Routledge.

Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883718

Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 281-337). Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7

Rizzi, L., & Bocci, G. (2017). Left periphery of the clause: Primarily illustrated for Italian. In M. Everaert, H. C. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, second edition (pp. 1–30). Wiley Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom104

Rudin, C. (1988). On multiple questions and multiple wh-fronting. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, pp. 455-501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134489

Samek-Lodovici, V. (2015). The interaction of focus, givenness, and prosody: A study of Italian clause structure. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198737926.001.0001

Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., & Paoli, S. (2004). Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax–pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in English–Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(3), pp. 183-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001610

Sprouse, J., Almeida, D. (2013). The empirical status of data in syntax: A reply to Gibson and Fedorenko. Language and cognitive processes, 28, pp. 222-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.703782

Sprouse, J., Schütze, C. T., & Almeida, D. (2013). A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgements using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001-2010. Lingua, 134, pp. 219-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002

Sprouse, J. (2015). Three open questions in experimental syntax. Linguistics Vanguard, 1(1), pp. 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2014-1012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2014-1012

Stoyanova, M. (2008). Unique focus: Languages without multiple wh-questions. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/la.123

Vettorel, P. (2013). English in Italian advertising. World Englishes, 32(2), pp. 261-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12023




How to Cite

Neagu, A. (2021). On the acceptability of multiple interrogatives in Italian. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and Linguistics at York, 1, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.25071/2564-2855.8




Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.