The other-accent effect on speaker recognition
A study on Quebec and Hexagonal French
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/2564-2855.44Keywords:
speaker recognition, voice lineup, other-accent effect, forensic phoneticsAbstract
The present article investigates the other-accent effect (OAE) on speaker recognition in the context of voice line-ups for speakers of Quebecois and Hexagonal (France) French. The literature largely attests to a language familiarity effect (LFE) that can bias the results of this forensic phonetics technique. A far less substantial number of studies have investigated whether this finding also extends to varieties of a single language (regional or social). The main aims of the present study are therefore to test whether such an effect is present for the two varieties of French concerned, and whether the predominance of the so-called “standard” variant of French generates a measurable asymmetry in this effect. Participants (n = 34) whose native French was either Quebecois or Hexagonal took part in a speaker recognition task through two voice line-ups, one for each variety of French. The findings indicate that there is no significant OAE on speaker recognition for the French varieties studied, despite some noteworthy tendencies related to the asymmetry between the two varieties of French and the duration of stay of the French participants in Quebec.
References
Atkinson, N. (2015). Variable factors affecting voice identification in forensic contexts [PhD thesis, University of York]. White Rose eTheses Online. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/13013/
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell., S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ‘21) (pp. 610–623). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Betancourt, K. S., & Bahr, R. H. (2010). The influence of signal complexity on speaker identification. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 17(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v17i2.179
Brasseur, A., & Ménard, L. (2013). Les marqueurs dialectaux du français québécois: Perception de locuteurs québécois. In La perception des accents du français hors de France. Actes du colloque international d’Avignon, 17-18 novembre 2011 (pp. 103–127).
Broeders, A. P. A., & van Amelsvoort, A. G. (1999). Lineup construction for forensic earwitness identification: A practical approach. Communication presented at 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, CA.
Bull, R., & Clifford, B. R. (1999). 4. Earwitness testimony. Medicine, Science and the Law, 39(2), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/002580249903900206
Clifford, B. R., Rathborn, H., & Bull, R. (1981). The effects of delay on voice recognition accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044763
Consulat général de France à Québec. (2020, April 8). La communauté française au Québec. https://quebec.consulfrance.org/La-communaute-francaise-au-Quebec
Cook, S., & Wilding, J. (1997). Earwitness testimony: Never mind the variety, hear the length. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199704)11:2<95::AID-ACP429>3.0.CO;2-O
de Jong-Lendle, G., Nolan, F., McDougall, K., & Hudson, T. (2015). Voice lineups: A practical guide. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 10–14).
Doty, N. D. (1998). The influence of nationality on the accuracy of face and voice recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 111(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423486
Eriksson, E. J. (2007). That voice sounds familiar: Factors in speaker recognition. [Doctoral thesis, Department of Philosophy and Linguistics, Umeå University]. WorldCat.org. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-1106
Foulkes, P., & Barron, A. (2000). Telephone speaker recognition amongst members of a close social network. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 7(2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.2000.7.2.180
Foulkes, P., & French, P. (2012). Forensic speaker comparison: A linguistic–acoustic perspective. In L. M. Solan & P. M. Tiersma (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law (pp. 558–572). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0041
Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2020). car: Companion to Applied Regression. [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=car.
Gallucci, M. (2019). GAMLj: General analyses for linear models. [jamovi module]. https://gamlj.github.io/.
Gastaldi, J. L. (2021). Why can computers understand natural language? Philosophy & Technology, 34(1), 149–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00393-9
Goggin, J. P., Thompson, C. P., Strube, G., & Simental, L. R. (1991). The role of language familiarity in voice identification. Memory & Cognition, 19(5), 448–458. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03199567
Goldstein, A. G., Knight, P., Bailis, K., & Conover, J. (1981). Recognition memory for accented and unaccented voices. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17(5), 217–220. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03333718
Harvey, M. B., Giroux, M., & Price, H. L. (2023). Lineup size influences voice identification accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 37(6), 1303–1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4124
Hayward, W. G., Rhodes, G., & Schwaninger, A. (2008). An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition. Cognition, 106(2), 1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.002
Hollien, H. (2012). About forensic phonetics. Linguistica, 52(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.4312/linguistica.52.1.27-53
The jamovi project. (2023). jamovi (Version 2.3) [Software]. https://www.jamovi.org
Jessen, M. (2008). Forensic phonetics. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(4), 671–711. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00066.x
Jessen, M. (2020). Speaker profiling and forensic voice comparison: The auditory-acoustic approach. In M. Coulthard, A. May, & R. Sousa-Silva (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 382–399). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429030581-31
Johnson, E. K., Bruggeman, L., & Cutler, A. (2018). Abstraction and the (misnamed) language familiarity effect. Cognitive Science, 42(2), 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12520
Kerstholt, J. H., Jansen, N. J. M., van Amelsvoort, A. G., & Broeders, A. P. A. (2006). Earwitnesses: Effects of accent, retention and telephone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1175
Kircher, R. (2012). How pluricentric is the French language? An investigation of attitudes towards Quebec French compared to European French. Journal of French Language Studies, 22(3), 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269512000014
Kreiman, J., & Sidtis, D. (2011). Foundations of voice studies: An interdisciplinary approach to voice production and perception. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444395068
Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255(5044), 606–608. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736364
May, A., Sousa-Silva, R., & Coulthard, M. (2020). Introduction. In M. Coulthard, A. May, & R. Sousa-Silva (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 1–8). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429030581-1
Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3
McDougall, K. (2013). Assessing perceived voice similarity using Multidimensional Scaling for the construction of voice parades. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 20(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v20i2.163
Nolan, F. (1991). Forensic phonetics. Journal of Linguistics, 27(2), 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012755
Nolan, F. (2003). A recent voice parade. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 10(2), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.2003.10.2.277
Peirce, J. W., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M. R., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 195–203. https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
Perrachione, T. K., Chiao, J. Y., & Wong, P. C. M. (2010). Asymmetric cultural effects on perceptual expertise underlie an own-race bias for voices. Cognition, 114(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.012
Perrachione, T. K. (2018). Speaker recognition across languages. In S. Frühholz & P. Belin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of voice perception. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198743187.013.23
Philippon, A. C., Cherryman, J., Bull, R., & Vrij, A. (2007). Earwitness identification performance: The effect of language, target, deliberate strategies and indirect measures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1296
Plante-Hébert, J., & Boucher, V. J. (2014). L’identification vocale : Pour une quantification des effets de la familiarité. Communication presented at Journée d’Études sur la Parole, Le Mans. http://www.afcp-parole.org/doc/Archives_JEP/2014_XXXe_JEP_LeMans/2014_XXXe_JEP_LeMans.pdf
Plante-Hébert, J., & Boucher, V. J. (2015). Effects of nasality and utterance length on the recognition of familiar speakers. Communication presented at 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0772.pdf
Plante-Hébert, J., Boucher, V. J., & Jemel, B. (2021). The processing of intimately familiar and unfamiliar voices: Specific neural responses of speaker recognition and identification. PLoS ONE, 16(4), e0250214. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250214
Proulx, P., & Messier, L.-P. (2020). Ces audacieuses qui ont façonné le Québec: 60 portraits de femmes entêtées. Les Éditions du Journal.
Public Prosecution Service of Canada. (2018). L’innocence en péril : La nécessité de vigilance continue afin de prévenir les condamnations injustifiées au Canada. https://www.ppsc-sppc.gc.ca/fra/pub/ip-is/index.html
R Core Team (2021). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.1) [Software]. https://cran.r-project.org. (Package retrieved January 1, 2022, from MRAN snapshot).
Reinke, K., & Ostiguy, L. (2012). Doublage et sociolinguistique: Une étude comparative du doublage québécois et français. Zeitschrift für Kanada-Studien, 32(1), 26-48.
Rhodes, G., Hayward, W. G., & Winkler, C. (2006). Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 499–505. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193876
Robitaille, A. (2023). Portrait sociodémographique et régional des personnes admises au Québec de 2011 à 2020 et présentes en 2022. Ministère de l’Immigration, de la Francisation et de l’Intégration. Gouvernement du Québec.
Rose, P. (2002). Forensic speaker identification (1st ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203166369
Statistics Canada. (2022, August 22). Police-reported crime statistics in Canada, 2021. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2022001/article/00013-eng.htm#r9
Stevenage, S. V., Clarke, G., & McNeill, A. (2012). The “other-accent” effect in voice recognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 647–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.675321
Stevenage, S. V., & Neil, G. J. (2014). Hearing faces and seeing voices: The integration and interaction of face and voice processing. Psychologica Belgica, 54(3), 266–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pb.ar
Thompson, C. P. (1987). A language effect in voice identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350010205
Vanags, T., Carroll, M., & Perfect, T. J. (2005). Verbal overshadowing: a sound theory in voice recognition? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(9), 1127–1144. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1160
Watt, D., & Brown, G. (2020). Forensic phonetics and automatic speaker recognition: The complementarity of human- and machine-based forensic speaker comparison. In M. Coulthard, A. May, & R. Sousa-Silva (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 400–415). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429030581-32
Wilding, J., Cook, S., & Davis, J. (2000). Sound familiar? Psychologist, 13(11), 558–562.
Yu, M. E., Schertz, J., & Johnson, E. K. (2021). The other accent effect in talker recognition: Now you see it, now you don’t. Cognitive Science, 45(6), e12986. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12986
Zarate, J. M., Tian, X., Woods, K. J. P., & Poeppel, D. (2015). Multiple levels of linguistic and paralinguistic features contribute to voice recognition. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 11475. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11475
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pamela Bautista, Julien Plante-Hébert
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
