Graduate students would benefit from guidelines for preparing conference abstracts

A rhetorical moves analysis of French-language conference abstracts in language-related fields




conference submission abstract, rhetorical moves analysis, graduate student writing, genre mastery, writing skills


Graduate student writing is finally receiving substantial scholarly attention, but little is known about the characteristics of the unstructured graduate student conference abstract (GSCA). This study seeks to characterize the rhetorical structures of GSCAs, as a basis for identifying potential writing support strategies. 107 French-language GSCAs from language-related fields (e.g., linguistics, second-language teaching) were coded using Hyland’s rhetorical moves (RMs) (Background-Aims-Methods-Results-Conclusion), yielding measures for RM frequency, RM sequencing, and RM recycling. We then use these measures to identify GSCAs that pattern together, via K-Means clustering. We find that the GSCAs studied pattern into three subtypes, two of which (72%) exhibit informational and/or structural shortcomings, most notably (1) missing RMs, (2) cognitively difficult RM sequences, and (3) unbalanced word-to-RM allotment. This study thus confirms that there is a need to implement strategies (e.g., conference submission guidelines) to better support graduate students in mastering this academic genre’s normative content and structure.


Addinsoft. (2021). XLSTAT statistical and data analysis solution, v.2.2.1141.

ARWU. (2022). Academic Ranking of World Universities 2022.

Badenhorst, C. M. (2019). Literature reviews, citations and intertextuality in graduate student writing. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(2), 1–13. DOI:

Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1997). Gatekeeping at an academic conference. In Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power (pp. 97–116). Routledge.

Beyea, S. C., & Nicoll, L. H. (1998). Writing and submitting an abstract. AORN Journal, 67(1), 173–174. DOI:

Cavalieri, S. (2014). Variation across disciplines. The case of applied linguistics and medicine. In M. Bondi & R. L. Sanz (Eds.), Abstracts in academic discourse: Variation and change (pp. 161–174). Peter Lang.

Cutting, J. (2012). Vague language in conference abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(4), 283–293. DOI:

Egbert, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). Success in the abstract: Exploring linguistic and stylistic predictors of conference abstract ratings. Corpora, 10(3), 291–313. DOI:

El-Dakhs, D. A. S. (2018). Why are abstracts in PhD theses and research articles different? A genre-specific perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 48–60. DOI:

Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press. DOI:

Halleck, G. B., & Connor, U. M. (2006). Rhetorical moves in TESOL conference proposals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 70–86. DOI:

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.

Kaplan, R. B., Cantor, S., Hagstrom, C., Kahmi-Stein, L. D., Shiotani, Y., & Boyd Zimmerman, C. (1994). On abstract writing. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 14(3), 401–426. DOI:

Kodinariya, T. M., & Makwana, P. R. (2013). Review on determining number of clusters in K-Means clustering. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 1(6), 90–95.

Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). American Psychological Association. DOI:

Lave, J., & Wenger, É. (2001). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. In J. Clarke, A. Hanson, R. Harrison, & F. Reeve (Eds.), Supporting lifelong learning: Perspectives on learning (pp. 111–126). Routledge.

Maricic, I., & Pecorari, D. (2013). Mind the gap! Highlighting novelty in conference abstracts [Oral presentation].

Ondrusek, A. L. (2012). What the research reveals about graduate students’ writing skills: A literature review. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 53(3), 176–188.

Payant, C., & Hardy, J. A. (2016). The dynamic rhetorical structures of TESOL conference abstracts. BC TEAL Journal, 1(1), 1–17.

QS World. (2022). QS World University Rankings 2022.

Ren, H., & Li, Y. (2011). A comparison study on the rhetorical moves of abstracts in published research articles and master’s foreign-language theses. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 162–166. DOI:

Salager-Meyer, F. (1990). Discoursal flaws in Medical English abstracts: A genre analysis per research- and text-type. Text: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 10(4), 365–384. DOI:

Samar, R. G., Talebzadeh, H., Kiany, G. R., & Akbari, R. (2014). Moves and steps to sell a paper: A cross-cultural genre analysis of applied linguistics conference abstracts. Text & Talk, 34(6), 759–785. DOI:

Sánchez, J. A. (2018). Applicability and variation of Swales’ CARS model to applied linguistics article abstracts. Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada, 18, 213–240. DOI:

Santos, M. B. D. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 16(4), 481–499. DOI:

Sowell, J. (2019). How to write an ELT conference abstract. English Teaching Forum, 57(4), 12–23.

Stein, W. (1997). A genre analysis of the TESOL conference abstract [Unpublished PhD dissertation]. Oklahoma State University.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (1996). Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 45–58). John Benjamins. DOI:

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2009). Abstracts and the writing of abstracts. University of Michigan Press. DOI:

Times Higher Education. (2022). World University Rankings 2022.

VERBI Software. (2022). MAXQDA 2022.

Yakhontova, T. (2002). “Selling” or “telling”? The issue of cultural variation in research genres. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 216–232). Routledge.

Yoon, J., & Casal, J. E. (2020). Rhetorical structure, sequence, and variation: A step‐driven move analysis of applied linguistics conference abstracts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 462–478. DOI:

Zhang, C., & Liu, X. (2011). Review of James Hartley’s research on structured abstracts. Journal of Information Science, 37(6), 570–576. DOI:



How to Cite

Frazer-McKee, G., & Vogh, K. (2022). Graduate students would benefit from guidelines for preparing conference abstracts: A rhetorical moves analysis of French-language conference abstracts in language-related fields. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and Linguistics at York, 2, 89–111.




Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.